Legal Opinion

Henry King & Co. v. Arnett Bros.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 11, 1928Published

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

The appellee has made a motion to strike the appellants’ assignment of. error because they have not made appropriate references to the pages of transcript, and have not cited the law in accordance with the rules of this court. After an examination of the assignment of errors, we are of the opinion that the assignment is sufficient. While the citation to the record could have been a little more specific, and the citation of more authorities would have helped the court, still we think that our rules should receive a reasonable construction, and we think that appellants have reasonably complied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schramm & Schmieg Co. v. ShopeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Haralson v. MendelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  3. Donaldson Bros. v. ThornburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Pile v. McCoyTennessee Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API