Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Weil Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 22, 1924No. 14390PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. A sale of a stock of goods in bulk without a compliance with the requirements of the bulk-sales act of 1903 (Ga. L. 1903, p. 92; Civil Code of 1910, § 3228) conveys no title to the purchaser, as against the creditors of the vendor; and, although the purchaser may have paid to the vendor the purchase price therefor, the goods may, at the instance of the creditor of the vendor, be reached by garnishment as the vendor’s property, in the hands of the purchaser. Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Co., 131 Ga. 1 (62 S. E. 82).
2. An agent or representative whose duties are merely to sell goods…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Kaiser & Brother v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Kight v. Stephen Putney Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clifton v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Gaulding v. CourtsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Haralson v. MendelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- ROYAL OIL COMPANY, INC. v. HooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Royal Oil Co. v. HooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965