Mitchell v. Waller
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
While it is true that, as a general rule, the first grant of a new trial in a case will not be disturbed by this court unless the verdict and judgment rendered were absolutely demanded by the evidence and under the law (see Connolly Realty Co. v. Nally, 38 Ga. App. 292, 143 S. E. 786, and Stone v. Elder, 42 Ga. App. 508, 156 S. E. 475), there is no substantial conflict as to the material facts, and the questions presented here are purely of law.
This was a sale of a stock of merchandise and entire business by the defendant, Leonard, to the garnishee, Mason, and there was no compliance with the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stovall Co. v. Shepherd Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Wyone Shoe Co. v. Daniels & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Connally Realty Co. v. NalleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- National Cash Register Co. v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Haralson v. MendelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McLean v. GT Duke Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Albano v. Motor Center of Pocatello, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954