Albertson v. Williams

Ebbrhabdt, Judge.

There is a motion to dismiss the writ of error because certain facts alleged in Albertson’s various post trial motions were not approved by the trial judge as true in the bill of exceptions and on the ground that plaintiff in error • “then and there accepted and now accepts” to the court’s rulings. Under the view we take of the case below, it is irrelevant whether or not the facts alleged were true. Use of the word “accepts” in this context is not ground for dismissal of the writ. McIntyre v. Zac-Lac Cory., 107 Ga. App. 807 (1) (131 SE2d 640). The motion is denied.(a) We view…