Legal Opinion

Walther v. SAIF Corporation

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1991No. WCB 86-02176; CA A64494; SC S37311PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant petitions for review of the Court of Appeals’ order that dismissed his petition for judicial review because of lack of proof of timely filing.

The Court of Appeals received claimant’s petition for judicial review after the 30-day time period allowed by ORS 656.295(8). The date of mailing serves as the date of filing if a notice of appeal is “mailed by registered or certified mail and the party filing the notice has proof from the post office of such mailing date.” ORS 19.028(1). 1 ORS 19.028(3) provides that ORS 19.028(1) applies to petitions for judicial review. This case presents…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Southwest Forest Industries v. AndersOregon Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API