Legal Opinion
Rand v. Geithner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 24, 2009No. Civil Action 08-0703 (PLF)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This employment discrimination case is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for partial dismissal or, alternatively, for partial summary judgment. 2 After careful consideration of the parties’ papers and the entire record in the case, the Court granted defendant’s motion by Order of March 31, 2009. This Opinion explains the reasoning underlying that Order. The Court will treat defendant’s motion as a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction with respect to plaintiffs failure to accommodate claim and grant the motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Latson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Uzlyan v. SolisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Ragsdale v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Klute v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.