Legal Opinion
Moncada v. Peters
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2008No. Civil Action 05-0470 (PLF)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on (1) defendant’s renewed motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and (2) plaintiffs motion to strike certain exhibits attached to defendant’s renewed motion. 2 The Court will deny plaintiffs motion to strike and grant defendant’s renewed motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
This is an employment discrimination case brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Smith v. JaneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Adesalu v. CoppsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Kelly v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Pearson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Porter v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.