Heimann v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order taxing their costs on appeal. Their memorandum of costs included items aggregating $268.98 for printing briefs, petitions for rehearing and hearing, and answer to petition for rehearing, in this action in eminent domain. Upon motion of defendants, the superior court taxed their costs for such printing at $100.
Appellants contend that it was error to strike $168.98 from their cost bill, for the reason that the “$100 excess rule does not apply to an eminent domain case because it would take from the plaintiff the sum of $168.98 on his recovery of damages for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- City of San Francisco v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Sime v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Lane v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Weck v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Combs v. HaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- City of Burbank v. NordahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962