Legal Opinion

Lane v. Pacific Greyhound Lines

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1947No. S. F. 17446, 17447PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This court reversed a judgment for defendants in Lane v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, 26 Cal.2d 575 [160 P.2d 21], and plaintiffs appeal from certain orders in the proceedings taxing costs on the prior appeal.

Plaintiffs filed their bill for costs on appeal the day following the filing of the remittitur in Lane v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, supra, 26 Cal.2d 575. The bill, in addition to a charge of $100 for the cost of printing briefs on appeal, included, as separate items, charges for printing plaintiffs’ petition for hearing in the Supreme Court, the opinion of the District Court of Appeal as a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Lane v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Haviland v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. In Re Estate of SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. City of Oakland v. DarbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. McCormick v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Combs v. HaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API