Legal Opinion

Hay v. Pacific Tastee Freez, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, j.

The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Arthur D. Hay, brought this suit for rescission of a franchise agreement entered into with the defendant Pacific Tastee Freez, Inc. The defendant, Harold H. McMurray, was a vice president of Tastee Freez in charge of its operations in Oregon. After a trial the court found for defendants and entered a decree dismissing plaintiffs’ suit. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The principal issues are (1) whether defendants misrepresented the business to plaintiffs; (2) whether plaintiffs promptly sought rescission after learning of the alleged misrepresentations;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scott v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Wagner v. Rainier Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Shopping Centers of America, Inc. v. Standard Growth Properties, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Western Bank v. MorrillOregon Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bodenhamer v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. McDonald v. ShoreOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Horton v. ReelyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API