Legal Opinion
Horton v. Reely
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 13, 1990No. Civ. No. 89-884-FRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, District Judge:
In the matter before the court, plaintiffs, Byron W. Horton and Helen Horton, move the court (# 32) for summary judgment in their favor on the grounds that there is no issue of material fact and they are entitled to judgment in their favor as a matter of law. The Hortons seek to recover the remaining balance due on a promissory note, together with interest and reasonable attorney fees.
UNDISPUTED FACTS
In 1978, the defendants purchased from the Hortons the B & H Cattle Company, Inc., consisting of a cattle ranch near Enterprise, Oregon. The transaction was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Betty Sankovich v. The Life Insurance Company of North America and Credit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.