Legal Opinion

Naporra v. Weckwerth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 2, 1929No. 27,227PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant appealed from a judgment.

Charles N. Norton formerly owned the 80 acres of land now owned by plaintiff. Edward Weckwerth then owned the land adjoining on the west which is now owned by defendant. Silas Keochel owned land adjoining the Naporra land on the east. The surface water naturally flows to the west. It finds a ravine on defendant’s land perhaps 30 rods from the Naporra land.

In the fall of 1908 Norton and Keochel employed Emil Sahler to construct with a ditching machine an open ditch from the Keochel land across the Naporra land and onto and across the Weckwerth land to said…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. ColesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  2. Fredericksen v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Collins v. ColleranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Munsch v. StelterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Guse v. FlohrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Cremer v. Cremer Rodeo Land and Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Larue v. KosichArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Ehle v. ProsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Lindokken v. PaulsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API