Legal Opinion

Dean v. Goddard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1893No. 8257PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal by defendant, Fred É. G-oddard, from an order of tbe District Court of Hennepin County, Thomas Canty, J., made December 3, 1892, denying bis motion for a new trial. Tbe plaintiff, Alfred J. Dean, brought this action September 3, 1891, under 1878 G. S. ch. 75, § 2, to determine tbe adverse claims of Goddard and all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the opinion. Goddard alone answered.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant, Fred É. G-oddard, from an order of tbe District Court of Hennepin County, Thomas Canty, J., made December 3, 1892, denying bis motion for a new trial. Tbe plaintiff, Alfred J. Dean, brought this action September 3, 1891, under 1878 G. S. ch. 75, § 2, to determine tbe adverse claims of Goddard and all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate described in the opinion. Goddard alone answered. He claimed to have the title in fee derived from the United States. Plaintiff replied that neither Goddard his- ancestor,…

1Opinion of the CourtBucK, J.

The question raised in this ease is whether the plaintiff has acquired title by adverse possession to the premises described in the complaint, viz. the front half of lots one (1) and two (2) in block sixty seven (67) in the city of Minneapolis.

The action was commenced in August, 1891. In his complaint the plaintiff alleges that he is in possession, and is the owner in fee simple, of the premises above described, and that the defendants claim some estate or interest in the premises adverse to the plaintiff, and prays that the claims of the respective parties be adjudged and determined, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Baker v. . OakwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Sherin v. BrackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Paine & Slocum v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1877

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Rennert v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Swan v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Wood v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Ehle v. ProsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API