Legal Opinion

Seekatz v. Brandenburg

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1931No. 20061PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, V. C. J..This is an equitable action to set aside a judgment and restrain the sale of lands thereunder commenced in the district court of Tulsa county, by defendant in error, A. Brandenburg, by his next friend, F. J. Brandenburg, against J. A. Seekatz, C. E. Little, Falby Little, and R. D. Sanford, sheriff of Tulsa county, of which defendants -below J. A. Seekatz alone appears as plaintiff in error herein.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below.

Plaintiff alleged, in substance, that defendants C. E. and Falby Little executed note and mortgage to him on August…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Continental Gin Co. v. De BordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Jones v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Griffin v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Crutchfield v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Owens v. State Ex Rel. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Edwards v. Andrews, Davis, Legg, Bixler, Milsten & Murrah, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. JansenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Parker v. Board of Com'rs of Okmulgee CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Lewis v. CouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API