Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Andrews, Davis, Legg, Bixler, Milsten & Murrah, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 1, 1982No. 54858, 54859PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Justice.
I. NO. 54,858
From an order of the District Court of Oklahoma County sustaining the demurrer of defendant and dismissing the cause of plaintiff, Roberta Edwards, this appeal is prosecuted. The demurrer of Andrews, Davis, Legg, Bixler, Milsten & Murrah, Inc., was sustained upon the ground that the action for damages incurred as a result of alleged legal malpractice was barred by the applicable statute of limitations, 12 O.S. 1971 § 95, 3rd.
The defendant firm represented plaintiff in four actions in Colorado and Oklahoma. On October 12, 1976, defendant advised plaintiff to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seitz v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Randall v. . Van WagenenNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Roxana Petroleum Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Stubblefield v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Western State Hospital v. StonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wing v. LortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Benham-Blair & Affiliates, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Hawzipta v. Independent School District No. 1-004 of Noble CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- Mehdipour v. HollandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Bero-Wachs v. Law Office of Logar & PulverNevada Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.