Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Bupp

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 2008No. 317 WDA 2007PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BOWES, J.:

¶ 1 This appeal and cross-appeal followed the trial court’s determination that Michael Bupp (“Seller”) breached a real estate sales agreement and its pretrial ruling that limited the amount of damages recoverable by James Quinn (“Buyer”). We affirm the trial court’s conclusion that Buyer is entitled to specific performance of the agreement, but we reverse in part its decision to restrict the amount of damages that Buyer is entitled to recover. We remand solely for a hearing on damages as further outlined in this adjudication.

¶ 2 Buyer instituted this breach of contract…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. K.H. v. J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Midomo Co. v. Presbyterian Housing Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Rusiski v. PribonicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Gaffer Insurance v. Discover Reinsurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rohm and Haas Co. v. LinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. In re Bridgeport Fire LitigationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Banohashim v. R.S. Enterprises, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. In Re Bridgeport Fire LitigationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Shellenberger, R. v. Kreider Dairy FarmsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API