Legal Opinion

Rusiski v. Pribonic

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1986No. 91 W.D. Appeal Docket 1984PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.*

The Appellants are the fee-simple owners of a fifty-acre tract in White Oak Borough, Allegheny County. They entered into an Agreement of Sale with the Appellees in which they agreed to sell the house in which they lived with its attendant outbuilding on a two-acre plot carved from their fifty-acre tract. The house and outbuildings in their intended geography were landlocked. To sell, therefore, *387they offered access across their remaining land to the public roadway.

In the Agreement of Sale, that intention was embodied as follows:

Sellers agree at the time…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Frowen v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Hartman v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Nationwide Insurance v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API