Legal Opinion

In re Bridgeport Fire Litigation

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 14, 2012PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

OLSON, J.:

Currently before the Court is the appeal of Appellants, Professional Flooring Co., Inc., Limerick Carpet and Flooring, Inc., Rose Line, Inc., and Renu Electronics, Inc. (“Appellants” or “Certain Class Plaintiffs”) of the July 27, 2011 order denying the *226Motion of Certain Class Plaintiffs for Re-cusal of the Honorable Steven T. O’Neill from Continuing to Serve as Presiding Judge Over the Bridgeport Fire Litigation. After careful review, we quash the appeal.

The history of this case is long and complex. A prior panel of this Court set forth the factual and procedural history…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rohm and Haas Co. v. LinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Stahl v. RedcaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Quinn v. BuppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. v. KesslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. In Re Bridgeport Fire LitigationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. McGrogan v. First Commonwealth BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Schmitt, E. v. State Farm Auto InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Haviland v. Kline & Specter, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Linde, B. v. Linde, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API