Legal Opinion

Gaffer Insurance v. Discover Reinsurance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 2007PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

McCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellants, Discover Reinsurance Company (“Discover”), United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, and the St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc., appeal from the order of the trial court denying preliminary objections that sought to compel arbitration in a dispute with Appellees, Gaffer Insurance Company, Ltd. (“Gaffer”), Murray Insurance Agency, Inc., Kelly-Murray Insurance Agency, Inc., Brian J. Murray, Christine M. Oliver Shean, and Douglas J. Murray. 1 The issue presented is one of contract interpretation: whether a service of suit/consent to jurisdiction…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Salley v. Option One Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Johnston County v. R. N. Rouse & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Smith v. Cumberland Group, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Century Indemnity Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Pisano v. Extendicare Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Walton v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Knight v. Springfield HyundaiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. MacPherson v. Magee Memorial Hospital for ConvalescenceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API