Legal Opinion

Raile Family Trust Ex Rel. Raile v. Promax Dev. Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2001No. 990322PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

DURRANT, Justice:

T 1 Rick and Martha Raile, acting as trustees of the Raile Family Trust (the "Trust"), appeal the trial court's decision granting summary judgment to Promax Development Corporation, Emigration Place Development (collectively "Promax"), and Phil Bates. The Railes also appeal the court's decision awarding attorney fees to Promax.

BACKGROUND

12 On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we present the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. See Ryan v. Dan's Food Stores, 972 P .2d 395, 399 (Utah 1998). We have already related many of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Bonneville Travel, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. ProMax Development Corp. v. RaileUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Faust v. KAI Technologies, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Green v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schuurman v. ShingletonUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Nu-Med USA, Inc. v. 4Life Research, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Gardiner v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  4. Yanaki v. Iomed, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  5. 3 Dimensional Contractors v. Utah Association of Municipal Power SystemsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API