Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Bonneville Travel, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1997No. 950412PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Plaintiffs Wayne and Suzanne Stephens and Ralph and Eileen Siebert appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Bonneville Travel, Inc., dba Beehive Business and Leisure Travel (“Beehive”), based on the court’s ruling that Utah Code Ann. § 32A-14-101 (the “Dram-shop Act” or “Act”) does not apply to an entity that provides liquor to an apparently intoxicated person in a noncommercial social setting.

FACTS1

Beehive is a travel agency that is not in the business of selling, storing, serving, manufacturing, or distributing alcoholic products. On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. World Peace Movement of America v. Newspaper Agency Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Anderson Development Co. v. TobiasUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ward v. State of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. State v. JeffriesUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. RudolphUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. C.T. Ex Rel. Taylor v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1999

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API