Schuurman v. Shingleton
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
1 Plaintiff brought an action against defendant, her former psychotherapist, for medical malpractice and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment, ruling that plaintiffs claim for medical malpractice was barred by the statute of limitations and that plaintiff had not alleged facts sufficient to state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. We affirm.
BACKGROUND!
%2 In June 1988, plaintiff began treatment with defendant for depression and an eating disorder. Plaintiff saw defendant for a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Zipkin v. FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Samms v. EcclesUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. City of WellsvilleUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Peteler v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Smith v. Four Corners Mental Health Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Campbell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
- Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.