Yanaki v. Iomed, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge:
¶ 1 Jamal Yanaki appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his claims against Iomed, Inc. (Iomed), Robert J. Lollini, and Mary Crowther (collectively, Defendants). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In April 2002, Iomed filed suit against Yanaki (the first ease), claiming that he had breached two agreements he had entered into during his employment with Iomed (the IP Agreement and the Education Agreement). In response to this suit, Yanaki filed a counterclaim against Iomed in early 2003, joining Lollini and Crowther, and asserting that Iomed had breached the IP Agreement, that Iomed had…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilkes v. Wyoming Department of Employment Division of Labor StandardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Tucker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Shipman v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Raile Family Trust Ex Rel. Raile v. Promax Dev. Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Clear Creek v. Peterson PipelineCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022