City of Cerritos v. CERRITOS TAXPAYERS ASSN.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LICHTMAN, J. *
SUMMARY
The principal questions in this case are two. The first is whether a city and a redevelopment agency may use funds earmarked for low- and moderate-income housing to purchase and renovate property which would then be leased to a school district, as part of an arrangement in which the district would in turn lease other property (currently housing its administrative offices) to the redevelopment agency (and ultimately to a nonprofit housing corporation) for the construction of a low- and moderate-income apartment complex for senior citizens. The second question is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. RapseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Rider v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- California Housing Finance Agency v. PatitucciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Cuenca v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.