Legal Opinion

City of Cerritos v. CERRITOS TAXPAYERS ASSN.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 2010No. B214530PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LICHTMAN, J. *

SUMMARY

The principal questions in this case are two. The first is whether a city and a redevelopment agency may use funds earmarked for low- and moderate-income housing to purchase and renovate property which would then be leased to a school district, as part of an arrangement in which the district would in turn lease other property (currently housing its administrative offices) to the redevelopment agency (and ultimately to a nonprofit housing corporation) for the construction of a low- and moderate-income apartment complex for senior citizens. The second question is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. RapseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. California Housing Finance Agency v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rider v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. California Housing Finance Agency v. PatitucciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Cuenca v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API