Legal Opinion

Mills v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1964No. Civ. 21660PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

The problem in this case is whether an insurance company which has paid claims under an uninsured motorist clause might, under the law as it existed from 1959 until its amendment in 1961, recover the amount paid against a party legally responsible for the accident, other than the uninsured motorist. The facts of the accident and of the actions taken by various parties since that time are without dispute, for present purposes, because the cause had not gone beyond the pleading and motion stages before judgment was rendered.

On February 5, 1961, Dennis A. Brever, accompanied by his wife,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Peller v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Rampy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  4. MFA Mutual Ins. Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. MacRiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API