Smith v. Broderick
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of ■ the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff is the assignee of the claims of sundry individuals for merchandise sold and delivered by them to the city and county of San Francisco, and for labor performed by them for said municipality prior to June 9, 1893, and on that day he commenced an action against the city and county to recover a judgment for the amount of said claims. Prior to the commencement of the action the board of supervisors had adopted a resolution authorizing the city and county attorney to allow judgment to be taken and entered against the city and county in all cases in the litigation of claims against it…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Folsom v. Mayor and Administrators of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ralls County Court v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. County of MacOnSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Commissioners of Taxing Dist. of Brownsville v. LoagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Co. v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Arthur v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Reclamation District No. 551 v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Weaver v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.