Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Kubo & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1928No. Docket Nos. 3336 and 3337PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Plaintiff filed two complaints in the court below against the defendant, had judgment against the defendant in both actions, and as the evidence in th~ actions is the same, both are presented to us for consideration upon one transcript.

In action No. 5819 in the trial court the complaint alleges as follows: That within one year last past the defendant became and now is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $653, lawful money of the United States of America, being the balance due the plaintiff from the said defendant for the reasonable value of goods, wares, and merchandise stolen and taken…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hallidie v. EngingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Faulkner v. First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bechtel v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Corey v. StruveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Lehmann v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Glantz v. FreedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Nutzel v. KozdronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Anderson v. DoolittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Murrish v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. StarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API