Legal Opinion

Murrish v. Industrial Indemnity Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1986No. A026779PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

This appeal concerns the timeliness of appellant-claimant’s 90-day notice to a payment bond surety pursuant to Civil Code section 3091. The trial court determined that the required notice was untimely and granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendant. We affirm for the reasons stated.

Procedural Background

The relevant procedural background reveals the following: On September 14, 1981, appellant Murrish and R & D Watson, Inc., (hereafter Watson Company) entered into a contract whereby Watson Company would remove dirt from appellant’s land for use in a public…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Fredericksen v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Armstrong v. Kubo & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McBride v. BoughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. In re iPhone Application Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. Banks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API