Legal Opinion
Nutzel v. Kozdron
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 15, 1944No. Civ. 14456PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From an order granting defendants’ motion to vacate an attachment levied on funds deposited by defendants in two Los Angeles banks, plaintiff appeals.
These are the essential facts:
On October 30, 1943, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants in the form of a common count for money had and received in the sum of $9,200 and caused a writ of attachment to be levied upon funds which defendants had deposited in two Los Angeles banks. In order to secure the writ of attachment plaintiff’s attorney filed an affidavit in which it was alleged that plaintiff’s cause of action against defendants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Los Angeles Drug Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. GetchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Hamburger v. HalpermCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Corum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wallace v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- National General Corp. v. Dutch Inns of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Anderson v. DoolittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Wallace v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 1953