Legal Opinion
In Re Metropolitan Securities Litigation
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided November 5, 2007No. CV-04-0025-FVSPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
FRED VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on four motions to dismiss brought by the various Defendants. In view of this procedural posture, the Court must accept all factual allegations set forth in the complaint as true for the purposes of the present order. Epstein v. Wash. Energy Co., 83 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir.1996). The following statement of facts is accordingly drawn from the pleadings.
BACKGROUND
This is a class action brought by investors against the former accountants, the Qualified…
2Cases cited102 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- In Re Amgen Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- DeKalb County Pension Fund v. Transocean Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In re Charles Schwab Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.