Legal Opinion
In re Charles Schwab Corp. Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 4, 2009No. C 08-01510 WHAPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*542ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS OF SCHWAB DEFENDANTS, INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES, AND PRICE-WATERHOUSECOOPERS; ORDER RE MOTION TO STRIKE
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this putative class action, plaintiffs allege that defendants Charles Schwab Corporation and several affiliated entities and individuals violated federal securities laws and various state laws by misrepresenting the risk profile and assets of Schwab’s YieldPlus Fund and by improperly changing the fund’s investment policies. Defendants include the Schwab Corporation, certain subsidiaries and officers, the YieldPlus Fund’s…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Rose v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Wells Fargo Mortgage-Backed Certificates LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Edward Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Rieckborn v. Jefferies LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.