Legal Opinion
In Re Amgen Inc. Securities Litigation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 1, 2008No. Case CV 07-2536 PSG (PLAx), CV 07-2849 PSG (PLAx), CV 07-2865 PSG (PLAx), CV 07-3145 PSG (PLAx), CV 07-3320 PSG (PLAx), CV 07-3950 PSG (PLAx)PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint
PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, District Judge.
In this class action for securities fraud, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants engaged in a scheme to deceive the investing public about the true value of Amgen stock. Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim. A hearing on the motion was held on January 28, 2008. Having considered the papers filed by the parties and oral argument on the motion, the Court GRANTS in part…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Houston v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. California · 2013
- City of Royal Oak Retirement System v. Juniper Networks, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- In Re New CenturyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Allstate Insurance v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.