Legal Opinion

Associated Homebuilders of the Greater East Bay, Inc. v. City of Livermore

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1961No. S. F. 20414PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendant City of Livermore appeals from a judgment which declares unconstitutional and void two of its ordinances providing for sewer connection charges for new connections to defendant’s sewer system, and awards plaintiff Associated Homebuilders the sum of $102,700, which the trial court found to be the total amount paid to defendant by plaintiff’s assignors under both ordinances.

Defendant contends that the subject legislation (Ordinance 332, adopted in 1956, superseded by Ordinance 382, adopted in 1958) is valid both as a proper exercise of the taxing power vested in defendant by section…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nickerson v. San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State of California v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1957
  3. City Council v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Bernstein v. BushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hunter v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Grupe Development Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. San Marcos Water District v. San Marcos Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. C.I. Mitchell & Best Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Coulter v. City of RawlinsWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API