Belmer v. Boyne City Tanning Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Charlevoix; Mayne, J. Case by Frederick Belmer, by next friend, against the Boyne City Tanning Company for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
In substance, the case stated in the *671declaration of the plaintiff is that, having been employed at labor not dangerous to life or limb, plaintiff was ordered from his regular employment to employment more dangerous and really hazardous, by one who had, as to him, the authority of the master; that plaintiff was immature, was advised by said superior that what might have been considered as an obvious danger was not a danger, and that he was injured in the said employment while following the directions of his superior, and was himself without fault. The trial of the case resulted in a verdict…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Beesley v. F. W. Wheeler & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Davis v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Nelson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Findlay v. Russel Wheel & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Christiansen v. HollingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Lapointe v. ChevretteMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Leitelt Iron Works Ex Rel. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. De VriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Murphy v. National Ice Cream Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Cubbage v. Estate of Conrad Youngerman, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.