Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1895PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Monroe. _(Kinne, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The accident which resulted in the death', of Mrs. Nelson occurred in Ohio, and this suit is brought’, under the Ohio statute, which is similar to that of Michigan, found in How. Stat. §§ 8313, 8314. The negligence-of the defendant is ■ conceded. The only questions arise-upon the measure of damages. A statement of the evidence-is essential to a proper understanding of the charge. There-is no dispute as to the evidence. Mrs. Nelson was 5¿ years old; her husband 56; and she left four children, — a-son, 23; a daughter, nearly 21; a daughter, 19; and a son, 16. She was an industrious woman, a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hurst v. Detroit City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Hunn v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Breckon v. Franklin Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Lincoln v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Courtney v. AppleMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Pensacola Electric Co. v. BissettSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  5. Sterling v. Union Carbide Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API