Findlay v. Russel Wheel & Foundry Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Case by William Findlay against the Russel Wheel & Foundry Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff was engaged in the manufacture of cars at the defendant’s car shop. The car bodies were placed upon trucks by the use of a rope, both ends of which extended to a point near the ceiling, where they passed through a double block, after which the ends united in a ring. A drum or winch was situated near, from which a rope proceeded through a sheave just above the floor. The rope had a hook at the end, which was used to hook into the ring mentioned. Winding the rope upon the drum had the effect of drawing itjthrough the sheave, and, in turn, would draw the double rope through the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Beesley v. F. W. Wheeler & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bauer v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. v. MilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Belmer v. Boyne City Tanning Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Mikolojczak v. North American Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Amoe v. Great Lakes Engineering WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.