Robinson v. Werner
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The issue confronting the court in this case is the effect of the lapse of a residuary clause in a will.
Appellant argues that when each residuary beneficiary died, there occurred a lapse of his share of the residue, resulting in an intestacy. However, when Emma Petti-bone died survived by two children, the anti-lapse statute 1 prevented a lapse of her share. In effect, appellant argues that she is entitled to one half of the one-fourth residuary share of Emma Pettibone, under the anti-lapse statute, plus the three other one-fourth shares of the other residuary beneficiaries who predeceased…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Will of ReynoldsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Hoermann v. HoermannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Stone v. StoneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Nielsen v. NielsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Schefe v. CrowleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. SchoendorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Estate of FarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- McElligott v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- In Matter of Estate of HillmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Hegner v. StaudenmaierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.