Legal Opinion

Estate of Farber

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1973No. 39PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The issue presented to the court in this case relates to the use of the language of disinheritance or negative words of exclusion in the last will and testament of the testatrix.

The will contained no residuary clause. Gallagher v. McKeague (1905), 125 Wis. 116, 119, 103 N. W. 233. Therefore, we are not here concerned with the lapse of a residuary clause in a will. 2

The gifts of one half of the estate to Mary and one half to Ida Mae and Erna, in equal shares, were not gifts to a class. Estate of Mory (1966), 29 Wis. 2d 557, 559, 139 N. W. 2d 623; Will of Johnson (1929), 199 Wis. 154, 225 N. W.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In re Donges's EstateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Koeber v. SomersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Benner v. MauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Will of EhlersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Stone v. StoneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Matter of Estate of LohrCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. Madison General Hospital Medical & Surgical Foundation, Inc. v. VolzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Matter of Estate of McWilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. McElligott v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API