Legal Opinion

In Matter of Estate of Hillman

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 22, 1985No. 83-1752PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

Delmer Jorns appeals a judgment construing William F. Hillman’s will. The trial court held that part of the residuary of Hillman’s estate should pass by the laws of intestacy because both the primary beneficiary and the substitute beneficiary predeceased the testator. The issues on appeal are:(1) Whether Hillman made a gift by implication to the heirs of the primary beneficiary, and(2) Whether the heirs succeed to the interest of the primary beneficiary pursuant to Wisconsin’s anti-lapse statute, sec. 853.27 (1), Stats.

Because the intention that the heirs of the primary beneficiary should…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hartwig v. BitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. MacLean v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Britt v. GarfootWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  5. In Matter of Estate of McWilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Olson v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  2. In re Estate of SweetNevada Supreme Court · 2022
  3. In re Estate of SweetCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API