Legal Opinion

McElligott v. Murray

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1974No. 248PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeufuss, J.

The issues are as follows:

1. In absence of specific language in the residuary clause or any ambiguity in the will read as a whole, and where the residuary legatee dies before the testatrix, may the court receive extrinsic evidence, based upon the circumstances of the case, to determine the probable intent of the testatrix so as to avoid intestacy?

2. Is the anti-lapse statute, sec. 853.27, which presumes a testamentary intent of substitution and legacies to persons who are, but not to persons who are not, related to the testatrix, unconstitutional ?

*4463. Should the trial court have granted…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nunnemacher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Breese v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Will of ReynoldsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Stone v. StoneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Kulike v. Town Clerk of the LebanonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bethesda Church v. MenningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Matter of Estate of McWilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Matter of Estate of HillmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. Trust Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Pauly v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API