Legal Opinion
XXL of Ohio, Inc. v. City of Broadview Heights
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 20, 2004No. 1:01 CV 2514PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
MATIA, Chief Judge.
The salient facts in this matter were set forth in the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 127), and this Court will not repeat them. Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs (referred to collectively hereinafter as “the city”) are seeking (1) to hold Third-Party Defendant Scottsdale Indemnity Company (“Scottsdale”) liable to indemnify the city for the amount paid to plaintiff XXL of Ohio, Inc., in settlement of a civil rights lawsuit involving the city’s enforcement of its sign ordinance, and (2) to obtain a ruling from this Court…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Madison Mutual Insurance Compa v. Diamond State Insurance CompaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Ferro Corp. v. Cookson GroupDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Baughman v. United States Liability InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009