Ferro Corp. v. Cookson Group
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SARA LIOI, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Ferro Corporation (“Ferro” or “Plaintiff”) filed a motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 55), seeking a determination that it is entitled to recover on its claim that Defendants Cookson Group pic, Cookson America, Inc., and Cookson Investments, Inc., (collectively, “Cookson” or “Defendants”) breached their duty to defend and indemnify Ferro. Cookson opposed Ferro’s motion for partial summary judgment, and filed its own motion for summary judgment (Doc.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Koch Industries, Inc. v. AKTIENGESELLSCHAFTDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- MDC Acquisition Co. v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- Maxum Indemnity Co. v. Robbins Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019