Legal Opinion

Qantel Corp. v. Niemuller

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 21, 1991No. 91 Civ. 0371 (PKL)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LEISURE, District Judge:

This is an action asserting numerous claims arising from defendants’ activities in connection with the operation and management of plaintiff Qantel Corporation. Defendants have now moved: 1) to dismiss the amended complaint, 1 pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants Christl Niemuller and Goodwood Management Services, Inc.; 2) to dismiss those claims alleging harm to Qantel Canada, Inc. for lack of standing; 3) to dismiss plaintiff’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  3. Three Crown Ltd. Partnership v. Caxton Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  4. Bank of America Corp. v. LemgruberDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API