Qantel Corp. v. Niemuller
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This is an action asserting numerous claims arising from defendants’ activities in connection with the operation and management of plaintiff Qantel Corporation. Defendants have now moved: 1) to dismiss the amended complaint, 1 pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants Christl Niemuller and Goodwood Management Services, Inc.; 2) to dismiss those claims alleging harm to Qantel Canada, Inc. for lack of standing; 3) to dismiss plaintiff’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Three Crown Ltd. Partnership v. Caxton Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Bank of America Corp. v. LemgruberDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.