Legal Opinion
Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 12, 2007No. 04 Civ. 2128(PKL)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
This action arises out of a failed investment transaction between plaintiff William Henneberry, the Chairman and majority common stock shareholder of Smartix International Corp. (“Smartix”), and defendant Sumitomo Corporation of America (“SCOA”), Robert Graustein, a Senior Vice president of SCOA, and Sumitomo Corporation (“Sumitomo”), SCOA’s parent company. In a complaint dated March 17, 2004, plaintiff asserted causes of action against all defendants for (1) detrimental reliance on the alternative bases of promissory estoppel and negligent…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ellington Credit Fund, Ltd. v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Oden v. Bos. Scientific Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- DDR Construction Services, Inc. v. Siemens Industry, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Naughright v. WeissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Cano v. DPNY, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.