Town of Morganton v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
The first question presented by the assignments of error is: What estate did plaintiff acquire by the condemnation proceeding? Was it, as plaintiff contends, .an unqualified estate in fee simple, or was it, as defendants contend, an easement leaving the fee in defendants in the condemnation proceeding with the right to harvest the timber grown thereon?
The answer is to be found by determining the extent of the power which plaintiff had to take and the extent to which such power was exercised.
The power of eminent domain, that is, the right to take private property for public use, is inherent in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Yarborough v. North Carolina Park CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Dingley v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- McConihay v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- City of Waukegan v. StanczakIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Kirby v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- Carolina Power & Light Company v. CreasmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. Core Banks Club Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.