Legal Opinion

Carolina Power & Light Company v. Creasman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 10, 1964No. 96PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

PETITIONER’S APPEAL

In condemnation proceedings, the petition, when filed by the con-demnor, “must contain a description of the real estate which the corporation seeks to acquire.” G.S. 40-12; 29 C.J.S., Eminent Domain § 259; 18 Am. Jur., Eminent Domain § 325. The condemnor must “first locate the property.” Gastonia v. Glenn, 218 N.C. 510, 11 S.E. 2d 459. Ordinarily, absent an amendment, the only property a condemnor may acquire is that described in the petition. See 29 C.J.S., Eminent Domain § 322.

Here, the petition describes a parcel of land fronting 69.82 feet on the western margin of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. United States v. GrizzardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Abernathy v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. City of Charlotte v. SprattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. In re R.A.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API