Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Barnett

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 9, 2006No. 05-0322/MCPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge BAKER

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant was tried by general court-martial before officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, he was convicted of two specifications of violating a lawful general order, three specifications of maltreatment, one specification of making a false official statement, four specifications of indecent assault and one specification of indecent acts 1 in violation of Articles 92, 93, 107 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 893, 907, 934 (2000). Appellant was acquitted of two specifications of violating a lawful…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  2. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  3. United States v. YammineCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  4. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  5. United States v. RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API