Legal Opinion
United States v. Bare
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 4, 2007No. 06-0911/AFPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge BAKER
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. He was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of sodomy with a child under twelve and indecent liberties with a child, in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 925, 934 (2000). Appellant pleaded guilty by exceptions to one specification of indecent acts with a child in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, but was found guilty as charged. The adjudged and approved sentence included a dishonorable discharge, confinement for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. DewrellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. BareUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. EdigerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. YammineCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. CronUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
- United States v. StatonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
- United States v. GladueUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.