Legal Opinion

United States v. Berry

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 10, 2005No. 04-0240/ARPublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN

delivered the opinion of the court.

After entering a guilty plea to the lesser included offense of sodomy, Sergeant (SGT) Bartholomew M. Berry was tried by a general court-martial on a number of offenses. Berry was convicted of the greater offense of committing sodomy by force and without consent, making a false official statement, committing an indecent act with another, and fraternization, in violation of Articles 107, 125, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 925, 934 (2000), respectively. Berry’s sentence, which was approved by the convening…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. MannsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. GuardiaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. United States v. HillsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  2. United States v. MoffeitCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. United States v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  4. United States v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  5. United States v. EdigerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API