Capital Investments, Inc. v. Lofgren
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
This is an action to enforce a guaranty. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, holding that a judgment in a prior action was res judicata and a bar to the present action. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that, because the prior action was brought prematurely, the resulting judgment does not act as a bar. We affirm, but on different grounds.
We set forth only the facts relevant to this appeal. 1 Plaintiff loaned $350,000 to Hoehnke Nursery Company in exchange for a promissory note signed by William Lofgren and defendant Jean Lofgren as officers of the company. At the same…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Marshall-Wells Co. v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Slate Construction Co. v. Pacific General Contractors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Houston v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Mendelson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jeffries v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Charles D. Finch v. U.S. Banik, N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
- Sandgathe v. JaggerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Livengood v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- McComas v. BocciCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.