Legal Opinion

Capital Investments, Inc. v. Lofgren

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 3, 1986No. A8405-03029; CA A36801PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

This is an action to enforce a guaranty. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, holding that a judgment in a prior action was res judicata and a bar to the present action. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that, because the prior action was brought prematurely, the resulting judgment does not act as a bar. We affirm, but on different grounds.

We set forth only the facts relevant to this appeal. 1 Plaintiff loaned $350,000 to Hoehnke Nursery Company in exchange for a promissory note signed by William Lofgren and defendant Jean Lofgren as officers of the company. At the same…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Marshall-Wells Co. v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Slate Construction Co. v. Pacific General Contractors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Houston v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Mendelson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Charles D. Finch v. U.S. Banik, N.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
  3. Sandgathe v. JaggerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Livengood v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. McComas v. BocciCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API